Top tip to siege-proof your own studies: don’t limit contact options to phone and email.

What’s the furthest you’ve ever gone to protect the integrity of a study?

Sorry for vagueposting.

Is ‘miscellaneous’ a valid research purpose for a dozen porcelain clown dolls?

Sometimes you can’t win even by following all the protocols.

Facilitate cross-institutional knowledge-sharing regarding known ‘problem participants’ in all prior and current studies (essential)

Correlation is not causation and karmic balance is not a scientifically valid concept